Launch Tomorrow

Landing Pages for your Lean Startup

  • Free Tools
  • About
  • Members
  • Corporate Innovation
  • Blog

Goal setting with creative boundaries

January 15, 2021 by Luke Szyrmer Leave a Comment

Recently I appeared on the marketing mindset internet radio show. It’s hosted by Marie Mason and it airs at 6pm EST. There aren’t many shows that drill down into this really important connection. In fact, like my friend Rob Drummond likes to say with respect to small businesses: almost every business problem is often rooted in a personal one.

 walkway
Photographer: Héctor J. Rivas | Source: Unsplash

We’ve had two weeks into the new year, so reality is starting to set in. I can’t say I am an expert in this topic, but on the show I do share what works for me. In particular, the focus was on boundary setting last year.

Setting good boundaries and holding yourself to them helps ensure you reach your goals, both personally and as an organization. I also think setting boundaries is intimately tied with a creative process and innovation, which we cover briefly.

chatting about boundaries

Have a listen and let me know what you think.

Also, my friend Rob Drummond (mentioned above) has a free kindle book offer until Sunday (Jan 17) night for his book Simple Story Selling. I love his work, as it results in bite size stories which we often already tell as founders or entrepreneurs. The approach really helps with writing emails. It also ties in really well to early-stage landing pages. In short, story is the best possible way to present new products to unaware audiences. Really, it’s a no brainer. Grab it, and read it when you have some time.

<< Help Yo' Friends

Filed Under: innovation, podcasts

Let’s talk about risk

December 18, 2020 by Luke Szyrmer Leave a Comment

Earlier this week, I was on the Yeukai Business Show talking about risk management in the context of startups. Yeukai was a great discussion partner, and pulled a lot of stories out of me. This is probably the more “storified” version of my work on risk management and experiments. As someone who spent 15+ years in financial markets and now almost 10 on innovation, I wanted to share the key learnings.

So if you want to learn how the foundations of identifying your biggest risks and being able to predict profitability and increase your confidence levels, pop over there and have a listen.

You'll discover:

  • The process of mitigating risk and cutting losses
  • The common reasons for loss and bankruptcy among tech startups
  • The impact of proper risk management, as well as 3 different ways to mitigate risk

If you want to find out more, check out Your First Startup Experiment to get even more tools and techniques on this topic.

<< Help Yo' Friends

Filed Under: assumptions, Estimation, podcasts, unknown unknowns Tagged With: existential risk, market risk, process risk

Your new product’s key milestones

December 15, 2020 by Luke Szyrmer Leave a Comment

time to break out the bubbly

While it would be presumptuous of me to say that all startups have exactly the same milestones, there are certain key moments in the life of every high growth tech startup.

  1. made first sale to someone you didn’t know beforehand
  2. make sales repeatedly
  3. enter high growth phase, where sales grow exponentially

The first sale

The first key moment in the life of a startup is the first sale, because you’ve solved all of the above problems. If you’ve successfully done that, you’ve essentially proven you have an attractive offer. You’ve proven you’re serving a niche willing to pay for your product or service. You’ve proven that your product description and positioning are effective enough to start building a business. For startups focussed on high adoption and user growth initially in order to become more valuable, this means you delay this first sale significantly (for example to advertisers). While it does work, it’s a much riskier strategy because you can’t answer the above questions. You need to think through how you can mitigate that risk initially as much as you can. For example, you can speak with potential advertisers to learn how big of a user base they want before being willing to purchase ads. Alternatively, you can try introducing a different payment scheme, such as a transaction-based cost, where you make a few pennines on each transaction so that users barely notice they’re paying you. These details are very much dependent on the type of business you want to run. If you are starting a multi-sided market, such as an exchange, you need to address the needs and concerns of each group, i.e. both buyers and sellers, which will typically be very different, in order to get that first sale.

Repeated sales

After you celebrate the first sale, your next major milestone would be to make sales repeatedly. At this stage you will need some kind of product or solution which you offer, at least a minimum viable product which focuses on the biggest pain point your users have. While it may be of prototype quality, you have enough to continue talking with customers about their problem in much greater depth, as they gain experience with your product. The time frame depends significantly on the size of transaction. The larger the transaction size, the more objections you need to overcome. So for example, for a low priced product like an iPhone app, a startup should be aiming to sell multiple times per day. This is pretty much an impulse buy. For a much higher priced product, such as a B2B software solution, you’d want to see a few sales per quarter. Convincing a number of people across a business, each with their own agendas and needs, to buy a $70,000 software package requires you to overcome a lot of objections. Total revenue should be financially significant, where you are able to cover your operating costs for example or quit your day job if you’re a solo founder.

Hockey stick

Phase 3 means that you’ve hit message-market fit within a particular niche. At that point you need to scale. Your biggest bottleneck stops being marketing, and starts to be fulfillment. You make promises in your marketing which were easy to fulfill at the first stages, but become difficult to fulfill at this stage. Often this will mean major changes are required. For example, you may need to perform a complete rewrite of your technology to be able handle the growth. While a prototype-quality product was ok to prove the business concept, you need to ensure that you keep a high standard of performance as new customers are pouring in. For example Facebook needed to rewrite a significant part of their original PHP code into highly optimized C++ code for the key components of their architecture, such as the social graph construction so that their newsfeed could keep up.

<< Help Yo' Friends

Filed Under: Growth Tagged With: faster time to market, market risk

How to ensure robust decisionmaking

December 5, 2020 by Luke Szyrmer Leave a Comment

The Toyota Prius was a fascinating car from a marketing perspective. At the time of launch, it was the first mass marketed electric hybrid car. It was initially aimed at the green and eco-friendly crowd: people keen on minimizing their carbon footprint. As a result, the marketing leaned heavily into using the ethical angle. They deployed guilt to reach eco-hipsters.

Photographer: Raivis Razgals | Source: Unsplash

It was like this for a few years, often with “manly man” types ridiculing both Priuses and their owners. Then, at one point, Uber took off in popularity. At the time, when we lived in London, it seemed that every time I hailed an Uber, the Prius was the most common car used. At first, I almost missed it. Eventually, I asked one of my drivers why he was driving a Prius. And he said:

“it’s actually the most economical car possible, in terms of running costs, because I get twice the mileage on the same tank of petrol.”

The Prius appealed to these drivers on a completely different business level. If your livelihood depended on your cost structure, you became more competitive. To some extent, the typical London-based Uber customers may have preferred taking a Prius because of the original eco-hipster argument. A hybrid car was not only cheaper but also better for the environment. So in addition to the cost angle, there was an indirect marketing upside for the drivers.

This is an excellent example of promoting social change through rational arguments. For an ethical argument to go “mass-market”, an innovation needs to appeal to the pragmatists, as per Geoffrey Moore’s classic book Crossing the Chasm. For this to happen, it needs to overcome a lot of skepticism. And it needs to have clear practical implications, in order to be a “common sense” choice. Even for an ethically superior product, most buyers need a practical rationale. Only then, it can spread and stick among the majority of people.

The practical argument for diversity

For years, I was looking for something similar in the context of diversity. I’ve been looking for hard evidence of the benefits of diversity. As an idea, diversity itself always resonated with me. Especially as a bootstrapping serial immigrant, I often felt out of place and disadvantaged relative to my peers. I felt empathy for minorities and outsiders. And often including them benefitted everyone. Yes, I acknowledge I did have it easier–growing up in the US as a white male. There were lots of pressures related to skin color, which I never felt.

Your riskiest assumptions are probably related to your prospects and customers. Establish empathy quickly with your target prospect, figure out what's valuable, and get your innovation into the market.

This year, #BlackLivesMatter and racial unrest in the US has sped up this social change. Other minorities have also made progress. Women, in particular, which have been a “minority” despite being half the population. The conversation has already shifted, and the denial has stopped.

I still believe these changes will be to everyone’s benefit. The main reason is that we all benefit from a clash of different perspectives. The more homogenous a group of people, the more they will be subject to bias and blind spots. The more variety you have, the greater the chance of reducing those distortions when making group decisions. It’s worth considering the impact of diversity. Include more perspectives and achieve a more robust outcome.

Opinions are like stocks

As a shorthand mental model, you can view diversity in organizations analogous to modern portfolio theory. In an investment context, owning a larger number of uncorrelated financial assets leads to better overall outcomes. There is a quantifiable benefit from this. The more stocks you have, the less you are exposed to company-specific risk. To some extent, the same is true with industries. If the travel sector gets hit hard by a pandemic, if you have some technology stocks, you’ll come out ok.

In a management decision making context, the same holds true for uncorrelated opinions. Having a number of uncorrelated opinions helps a group come up with a more robust view.

remove individual bias with diversity of opinion

There are many ways to benefit from this. One way I’ve seen this done explicitly is using personality assessment tools like DISC, Myers-Briggs, or Kolbe. Everyone is different. You can baseline how much natural preferences might skew the team perspective. Different people notice different details. It’s worth being mindful of potentially missing yet complementary perspectives. For example, in IT there tend to be a lot of data-driven logical people. Having someone who is more relational or “heart-driven” participate can incorporate more intuition into a decision.

Also, personal background, race, or orientation can also provide useful angles which a homogenous group of proverbial old white men could miss. Many businesses started to serve minorities, which the “white establishment” thought wasn’t viable. For example, Black Entertainment Television. Or major podcasts aimed at the Latino community.

Implications for managers

In the context of a specific company, we also often deal with people from different departments. They have different backgrounds, a different personal network, and often different goals. All of these would additionally influence their perspective. Converging onto a shared company-wide perspective helps create a common understanding of what best.

Often problems or challenges go unresolved, simply because we aren’t aware of them. Or we don’t see the full importance of resolving the problem, because we underestimate the full implications.

You can also go too far, according to the picture above. If you start to gather too many opinions, it stops adding that much extra value. The incremental value of a 201st opinion will be much smaller than a third one. You will have heard most of what’s worth taking into account much earlier than 201 interview earlier. There may be patterns in the data.

But you don’t have much risk of missing something obvious due to your own blind spots and “unknown unknowns”. With any decision, there will always be some risk which you can’t diversify away. Regardless of how many opinions you gather or who you ask, you still have to live with it. At minimum, you’ll achieve the main benefit of diversity in opinion: more robust outcomes. Ones that take into account all facts and which are less subjective.

If you’d like to read more, the above is an excerpt from my book Align Remotely. Bringing together diverse remote teams is an art, one you need to master if you want them to achieve high performance. Read on over here.

<< Help Yo' Friends

Filed Under: uncategorized

Here’s an example of an Extreme Product Launch

November 26, 2020 by Luke Szyrmer Leave a Comment

Extreme product launches are focused on getting you to that first sale as quickly as possible. By figuring out what works on a business level, you can then proceed to with the business growth because you’re already proven that a business case exists (at a small scale) for your product.

Launch Tomorrow

Landing Pages for your Lean Startup

  • Free Tools
  • About
  • Members
  • Corporate Innovation
  • Blog

Goal setting with creative boundaries

January 15, 2021 by Luke Szyrmer Leave a Comment

Recently I appeared on the marketing mindset internet radio show. It’s hosted by Marie Mason and it airs at 6pm EST. There aren’t many shows that drill down into this really important connection. In fact, like my friend Rob Drummond likes to say with respect to small businesses: almost every business problem is often rooted in a personal one.

 walkway
Photographer: Héctor J. Rivas | Source: Unsplash

We’ve had two weeks into the new year, so reality is starting to set in. I can’t say I am an expert in this topic, but on the show I do share what works for me. In particular, the focus was on boundary setting last year.

Setting good boundaries and holding yourself to them helps ensure you reach your goals, both personally and as an organization. I also think setting boundaries is intimately tied with a creative process and innovation, which we cover briefly.

chatting about boundaries

Have a listen and let me know what you think.

Also, my friend Rob Drummond (mentioned above) has a free kindle book offer until Sunday (Jan 17) night for his book Simple Story Selling. I love his work, as it results in bite size stories which we often already tell as founders or entrepreneurs. The approach really helps with writing emails. It also ties in really well to early-stage landing pages. In short, story is the best possible way to present new products to unaware audiences. Really, it’s a no brainer. Grab it, and read it when you have some time.

<< Help Yo' Friends

Filed Under: innovation, podcasts

Let’s talk about risk

December 18, 2020 by Luke Szyrmer Leave a Comment

Earlier this week, I was on the Yeukai Business Show talking about risk management in the context of startups. Yeukai was a great discussion partner, and pulled a lot of stories out of me. This is probably the more “storified” version of my work on risk management and experiments. As someone who spent 15+ years in financial markets and now almost 10 on innovation, I wanted to share the key learnings.

So if you want to learn how the foundations of identifying your biggest risks and being able to predict profitability and increase your confidence levels, pop over there and have a listen.

You'll discover:

  • The process of mitigating risk and cutting losses
  • The common reasons for loss and bankruptcy among tech startups
  • The impact of proper risk management, as well as 3 different ways to mitigate risk

If you want to find out more, check out Your First Startup Experiment to get even more tools and techniques on this topic.

<< Help Yo' Friends

Filed Under: assumptions, Estimation, podcasts, unknown unknowns Tagged With: existential risk, market risk, process risk

Your new product’s key milestones

December 15, 2020 by Luke Szyrmer Leave a Comment

time to break out the bubbly

While it would be presumptuous of me to say that all startups have exactly the same milestones, there are certain key moments in the life of every high growth tech startup.

  1. made first sale to someone you didn’t know beforehand
  2. make sales repeatedly
  3. enter high growth phase, where sales grow exponentially

The first sale

The first key moment in the life of a startup is the first sale, because you’ve solved all of the above problems. If you’ve successfully done that, you’ve essentially proven you have an attractive offer. You’ve proven you’re serving a niche willing to pay for your product or service. You’ve proven that your product description and positioning are effective enough to start building a business. For startups focussed on high adoption and user growth initially in order to become more valuable, this means you delay this first sale significantly (for example to advertisers). While it does work, it’s a much riskier strategy because you can’t answer the above questions. You need to think through how you can mitigate that risk initially as much as you can. For example, you can speak with potential advertisers to learn how big of a user base they want before being willing to purchase ads. Alternatively, you can try introducing a different payment scheme, such as a transaction-based cost, where you make a few pennines on each transaction so that users barely notice they’re paying you. These details are very much dependent on the type of business you want to run. If you are starting a multi-sided market, such as an exchange, you need to address the needs and concerns of each group, i.e. both buyers and sellers, which will typically be very different, in order to get that first sale.

Repeated sales

After you celebrate the first sale, your next major milestone would be to make sales repeatedly. At this stage you will need some kind of product or solution which you offer, at least a minimum viable product which focuses on the biggest pain point your users have. While it may be of prototype quality, you have enough to continue talking with customers about their problem in much greater depth, as they gain experience with your product. The time frame depends significantly on the size of transaction. The larger the transaction size, the more objections you need to overcome. So for example, for a low priced product like an iPhone app, a startup should be aiming to sell multiple times per day. This is pretty much an impulse buy. For a much higher priced product, such as a B2B software solution, you’d want to see a few sales per quarter. Convincing a number of people across a business, each with their own agendas and needs, to buy a $70,000 software package requires you to overcome a lot of objections. Total revenue should be financially significant, where you are able to cover your operating costs for example or quit your day job if you’re a solo founder.

Hockey stick

Phase 3 means that you’ve hit message-market fit within a particular niche. At that point you need to scale. Your biggest bottleneck stops being marketing, and starts to be fulfillment. You make promises in your marketing which were easy to fulfill at the first stages, but become difficult to fulfill at this stage. Often this will mean major changes are required. For example, you may need to perform a complete rewrite of your technology to be able handle the growth. While a prototype-quality product was ok to prove the business concept, you need to ensure that you keep a high standard of performance as new customers are pouring in. For example Facebook needed to rewrite a significant part of their original PHP code into highly optimized C++ code for the key components of their architecture, such as the social graph construction so that their newsfeed could keep up.

<< Help Yo' Friends

Filed Under: Growth Tagged With: faster time to market, market risk

How to ensure robust decisionmaking

December 5, 2020 by Luke Szyrmer Leave a Comment

The Toyota Prius was a fascinating car from a marketing perspective. At the time of launch, it was the first mass marketed electric hybrid car. It was initially aimed at the green and eco-friendly crowd: people keen on minimizing their carbon footprint. As a result, the marketing leaned heavily into using the ethical angle. They deployed guilt to reach eco-hipsters.

Photographer: Raivis Razgals | Source: Unsplash

It was like this for a few years, often with “manly man” types ridiculing both Priuses and their owners. Then, at one point, Uber took off in popularity. At the time, when we lived in London, it seemed that every time I hailed an Uber, the Prius was the most common car used. At first, I almost missed it. Eventually, I asked one of my drivers why he was driving a Prius. And he said:

“it’s actually the most economical car possible, in terms of running costs, because I get twice the mileage on the same tank of petrol.”

The Prius appealed to these drivers on a completely different business level. If your livelihood depended on your cost structure, you became more competitive. To some extent, the typical London-based Uber customers may have preferred taking a Prius because of the original eco-hipster argument. A hybrid car was not only cheaper but also better for the environment. So in addition to the cost angle, there was an indirect marketing upside for the drivers.

This is an excellent example of promoting social change through rational arguments. For an ethical argument to go “mass-market”, an innovation needs to appeal to the pragmatists, as per Geoffrey Moore’s classic book Crossing the Chasm. For this to happen, it needs to overcome a lot of skepticism. And it needs to have clear practical implications, in order to be a “common sense” choice. Even for an ethically superior product, most buyers need a practical rationale. Only then, it can spread and stick among the majority of people.

The practical argument for diversity

For years, I was looking for something similar in the context of diversity. I’ve been looking for hard evidence of the benefits of diversity. As an idea, diversity itself always resonated with me. Especially as a bootstrapping serial immigrant, I often felt out of place and disadvantaged relative to my peers. I felt empathy for minorities and outsiders. And often including them benefitted everyone. Yes, I acknowledge I did have it easier–growing up in the US as a white male. There were lots of pressures related to skin color, which I never felt.

Your riskiest assumptions are probably related to your prospects and customers. Establish empathy quickly with your target prospect, figure out what's valuable, and get your innovation into the market.

This year, #BlackLivesMatter and racial unrest in the US has sped up this social change. Other minorities have also made progress. Women, in particular, which have been a “minority” despite being half the population. The conversation has already shifted, and the denial has stopped.

I still believe these changes will be to everyone’s benefit. The main reason is that we all benefit from a clash of different perspectives. The more homogenous a group of people, the more they will be subject to bias and blind spots. The more variety you have, the greater the chance of reducing those distortions when making group decisions. It’s worth considering the impact of diversity. Include more perspectives and achieve a more robust outcome.

Opinions are like stocks

As a shorthand mental model, you can view diversity in organizations analogous to modern portfolio theory. In an investment context, owning a larger number of uncorrelated financial assets leads to better overall outcomes. There is a quantifiable benefit from this. The more stocks you have, the less you are exposed to company-specific risk. To some extent, the same is true with industries. If the travel sector gets hit hard by a pandemic, if you have some technology stocks, you’ll come out ok.

In a management decision making context, the same holds true for uncorrelated opinions. Having a number of uncorrelated opinions helps a group come up with a more robust view.

remove individual bias with diversity of opinion

There are many ways to benefit from this. One way I’ve seen this done explicitly is using personality assessment tools like DISC, Myers-Briggs, or Kolbe. Everyone is different. You can baseline how much natural preferences might skew the team perspective. Different people notice different details. It’s worth being mindful of potentially missing yet complementary perspectives. For example, in IT there tend to be a lot of data-driven logical people. Having someone who is more relational or “heart-driven” participate can incorporate more intuition into a decision.

Also, personal background, race, or orientation can also provide useful angles which a homogenous group of proverbial old white men could miss. Many businesses started to serve minorities, which the “white establishment” thought wasn’t viable. For example, Black Entertainment Television. Or major podcasts aimed at the Latino community.

Implications for managers

In the context of a specific company, we also often deal with people from different departments. They have different backgrounds, a different personal network, and often different goals. All of these would additionally influence their perspective. Converging onto a shared company-wide perspective helps create a common understanding of what best.

Often problems or challenges go unresolved, simply because we aren’t aware of them. Or we don’t see the full importance of resolving the problem, because we underestimate the full implications.

You can also go too far, according to the picture above. If you start to gather too many opinions, it stops adding that much extra value. The incremental value of a 201st opinion will be much smaller than a third one. You will have heard most of what’s worth taking into account much earlier than 201 interview earlier. There may be patterns in the data.

But you don’t have much risk of missing something obvious due to your own blind spots and “unknown unknowns”. With any decision, there will always be some risk which you can’t diversify away. Regardless of how many opinions you gather or who you ask, you still have to live with it. At minimum, you’ll achieve the main benefit of diversity in opinion: more robust outcomes. Ones that take into account all facts and which are less subjective.

If you’d like to read more, the above is an excerpt from my book Align Remotely. Bringing together diverse remote teams is an art, one you need to master if you want them to achieve high performance. Read on over here.

<< Help Yo' Friends

Filed Under: uncategorized

Here’s an example of an Extreme Product Launch

November 26, 2020 by Luke Szyrmer Leave a Comment

Extreme product launches are focused on getting you to that first sale as quickly as possible. By figuring out what works on a business level, you can then proceed to with the business growth because you’re already proven that a business case exists (at a small scale) for your product.

Jumping out of a plane

This type of proof is much more powerful than any business plan you could write. In most types of business, making your first sale is the one thing you can do to make everything else easier or unnecessary.

Originally, I released Launch Tomorrow as an “extreme product launch” myself, by pre-testing the interest in a book on this topic.

It got great initial reviews, like:

“In my corporate consulting days [with McKinsey & Co], I used to tell my clients market research is a waste of time, because projects usually took 3 months and required a budget of $50-150K. But this stuff really changes the equation!” –Robert Grossman, Marketing Expert, Former Managing Partner, McKinsey & Co.

“I really liked the fact that you with your strategy a person can evaluate if a business idea is worth pursuing for just a few hundred dollars, rather than risk $25,000 and most likely fail.” –Scott Dudley, Direct Response Copywriter

Now it’s in prime time. It’s about using landing pages as minimum viable products. Clarify your value proposition. Validate that your customers will pay, before you start building a product.

If you’ve enjoyed this content so far, I know you’ll love Launch Tomorrow. You can pick up a copy of Launch Tomorrow over here.

<< Help Yo' Friends

Filed Under: personal, unknown unknowns Tagged With: landing page mvp

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 10
  • Next Page »

By Role

  • Startup Founder
  • Software Manager
  • Remote Leader
  • Innovation Executive
  • You Like?

    Search

    Key Topics

  • Faster time to market
  • Early-stage Growth and Marketing
  • Product-Message-Market Fit
  • Experiments and Minimum viable products
  • Metrics
  • About Luke

    Luke Szyrmer is an innovation and remote work expert. He’s the bestselling author of #1 bestseller Launch Tomorrow. He mentors early stage tech founders and innovators in established companies. Read More…

    Topics

    • agile
    • alignment
    • assumptions
    • case study
    • conversion rate
    • delay
    • Estimation
    • experiments
    • extreme product launch
    • find people
    • funding
    • Growth
    • inner game
    • innovation
    • landing page
    • landing page MVP
    • manage risks
    • marketing
    • metrics
    • minimum viable product
    • modelling
    • modularity
    • personal
    • Pitch
    • podcasts
    • priorities
    • proof
    • release planning
    • Risk
    • software
    • startup
    • stories
    • time management
    • tools for founders
    • uncategorized
    • unknown unknowns
    • velocity
    • vizualization

    Tags

    agile funding automated testing bottleneck case study conway's law covid customer development digital taylorism existential risk extreme product launch faster time to market growth headlines identifying needs landing page mvp launch lean lean startup managing priorities market risk minimum viable product modularity numbers options output paypal planning principles prioritization problem to solve process risk product market fit real options split testing startup story systemic test driven development testing time management tool underlier value hypothesis value proposition work time

    Copyright © 2021 · Log in · Privacy policy · Cookie policy